Sunday, January 13, 2008

Not-So-Silly Scripture Tricks

This morning I heard a news story that made my skin crawl with embarrassment. CNN reported that a new movement has sprung up in mid-America. The gist of the story is that some apparently believe that this passage from Isaiah 35:8 -- “And a highway will be there; it will be called the Way of Holiness. The unclean will not journey on it; it will be for those who walk in that Way; wicked fools will not go about on it” -- is a specific reference to modern America's Interstate 35 and that it will fulfill its prophetic status as a "holy highway" only through the dedicated prayers of the faithful.
While this scripture gives us the basis for the entire Light The Highway movement, it also specifically gives us direction for our own lighting of the highway, Interstate 35. I-35: Highway of Holiness is about coordinating our efforts as a people across the nation to reclaim for the Kingdom of God what the enemy thinks is his own.
The originator of the concept of "Light the Highway"...
... is a Texas minister named Cindy Jacobs. She says she can't be sure Interstate 35 really is what is mentioned in the Bible but says she received a revelation to start this campaign after "once again reading Isaiah, Chapter 35."
She "can't be sure." But then again, she seems to think the idea is reasonable. Wow.

To be fair, not all proponents of this cause believe that this passage in Isaiah 35 is a literal reference to the modern American version of Interstate highway I-35. That makes me feel a little better. But, here's what they do believe:
... we do believe that we can use this text in a symbolic way as a catalyst to begin praying, just like those who live in Interstate 40 can use Isaiah 40:3,

"The voice of him that cries in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God",

and those on Interstate 10 could use John 10:10,

"The thief comes not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly."
My beef is not with those who feel the need to find ways to encourage others to pray for our nation. God knows we need that. But why is it that some feel that they have to concoct the most convoluted, nonsensical reasons to do so?

The problem here is bigger than it seems. Beyond making followers of Christ look a little silly (no doubt the reason CNN chose to run this story), it also unveils an even more insidious practice that is all-too-common even among those who are not out there doing silly things on national TV. This is the practice of "finding new revelations" and personalized messages buried within the Scripture, then claiming them for ourselves. This practice is similarly revealed in the oft-asked Sunday School question, "What does this passage mean to you?"

May I politely suggest that it doesn't matter what the passage means to you?

Seriously. What matters is simply what the passage means.

Why is it so hard to understand that what really matters in our interpretation of Scripture is not what we think we can "discover" in the text, but what the author of the Scripture meant to convey when they wrote it? No, finding that meaning is not an easy task, nor are we to demand that we have done so exhaustively, but the point is that we at least have to give our best in the endeavor. This is hard work ... too hard apparently, because most of us just don't try.

Greg Koukl points out that the habit of finding personalized meanings in the text of Scripture is an incredibly new phenomenon -- one that has just popped up in the last 150 years. I don't think it is a coincidence that this habit has arisen at the same time that existential, human-centered, philosophical reasoning has become all the rage. If everything else in the universe revolves around me personally, surely it follows that the Scripture was written to me personally.

Notice that the defenders of the I-35 phenomenon insist that we could use Isaiah 40 or John 10 in the same way they are using Isaiah 35. Why could we? The connection is absolutely baseless and absurd. By insisting that we can do so however, these folks open the door for those who could yank any passage, any verse, or any phrase out of Scripture, and then invoke it to defend any idea or practice that "works for them."

This is not to deny that there are implications and applications we can derive from our understanding of Scripture. But we need to remember that the intended meaning precedes any ability we have toward personal application. When we try to connect Isaiah 35 to Interstate 35 we simply look goofy. But when we accept the practice behind the goofiness, we are unconsciously engaging in a dangerously destructive abuse of the Bible.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Though I do not moderate comments, I reserve the right to delete any comment that I deem inappropriate. You don't have to agree with me, but I don't tolerate abusive or objectionable language of any kind.